Praise be to Allaah.
The clothing in which a woman appears before non-mahram men
must meet eight conditions:
It should cover the entire
body, including the face and hands. The evidence for that has been discussed
in the answer to question no. 11774.
It must be wide and loose, not
showing the size of her limbs or the shape of her body.
It should not be thin, showing
the colour of her skin.
It should not be an adornment
in and of itself, such as clothing decorated with embroidery.
It should not be perfumed.
It should not resemble the
clothing of men.
It should not resemble the
dress of kaafir women.
It should not be a dress of
fame and vanity.
See Adaab al-Zafaaf by Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allaah
have mercy on him), p. 177; Hijaab al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, p. 16-111;
‘Awdat al-Hijaab, 3/145-163.
Based on this, a woman
should not appear in front of men wearing pants or trousers for two
1 – They show the shape of the woman’s legs
2 – Wearing them is an imitation of men
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen
(may Allaah have mercy on him) said: I think that the Muslims should not
follow these fashions and kinds of clothes that come to us from here and
there. Many of them are not in accordance with proper Islamic dress which
involves covering the woman completely, like the short or very tight or thin
clothes. That includes pants, because they show the size of a woman’s legs,
as well as her stomach, waist, breasts, etc. Wearing it comes under the
description given in the saheeh hadeeth: “there are two types of the people
of Hell whom I have not seen: people with whips like the tails of cattle,
with which they strike the people, and women who are clothed yet naked,
walking with an enticing gait, with something on their heads that looks like
the humps of camels, leaning to one side. They will never enter Paradise or
even smell its fragrance, although its fragrance can be detected from such
and such a distance.”
This hadeeth was narrated by Muslim, 2128.
He also said: What I think is that it is haraam for women to
wear pants, because they are an imitation of men. The Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) cursed women who imitate men. It also
takes modesty away from the woman, because it opens the door to wearing the
clothes of the people of Hell, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said: “There are two types of the people of Hell whom I
have not seen…” and he described one of them as being, “women who are
clothed yet naked, walking with an enticing gait, with something on their
heads that looks like the humps of camels, leaning to one side. They will
never enter Paradise or even smell its fragrance, although its fragrance can
be detected from such and such a distance.”
End quote from Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen,
12, question no. 192, 104.
It says in Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah (17/102): It
is not permissible for (a woman) to wear pants, because that involves women
See also question no. 10436.
With regard to wearing pants under a jilbaab, there is
nothing wrong with that, rather it is more covering and more protective, if
the jilbaab is wide and concealing and does not have any splits that show
what is underneath it.
Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said: If a woman wears pants and puts over them a wide garment then she will
not be resembling men, so long as she wears them underneath her garments.
End quote from Fataawa al-Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi, p. 573.
The basic principle is that the woman’s jilbab should be wide
and cover the tops of her feet, because of the report narrated by
al-Tirmidhi (1731), al-Nasaa’i (5336), Abu Dawood (4117) and Ibn Maajah
(3580) from Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: The
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
“Whoever lets his garment drag out of pride, Allaah will not look at him on
the Day of Resurrection.” Umm Salamah said: “What should women do with their
hems?” He said: “Let them down by a handspan.” She said: “But then their
feet will be uncovered.” He said: “Then a cubit, but no more than that.”
This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Sunan
Al-Baaji said: The words of Umm Salamah (may Allaah be
pleased with her) regarding lengthening the hem by a handspan – “But then
their feet will be uncovered” – show that this length was not sufficient to
cover them, because the movement of her feet when walking quickly, combined
with the shortness of the hem, would lead to them being uncovered. When she
pointed that out to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him), he said: “Then a cubit, but no more than that.” End quote from
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan
(may Allaah preserve him) was asked: Is it mustahabb or waajib for a woman
to make her dress long? Is wearing socks on the feet sufficient if the dress
is shortened only so much that nothing of the calf shows? How should a woman
lengthen her dress by a cubit – below the ankle or below the knee?
He replied: What is required of the Muslim woman is to cover
all her body in front of men, hence she is allowed to lengthen her garment
by a cubit so as to cover her feet, whereas men are forbidden to let their
garments hang below their ankles. This indicates that women are required to
cover all of their bodies. If a woman wears socks that is doing something
extra to be more on the safe side with regard to covering, which is
something good. She should also make her garment long, as described in the
hadeeth. And Allaah is the Source of strength. End quote. Al-Muntaqa min
Fataawa al-Shaykh al-Fawzaan, 5/334.
The point is that a woman’s jilbab should be wide and come
down to her ankles or more. If it is short and comes a handspan above the
ankles, that is not permissible even if she covers her calves and feet with
pants or socks, because that is imitating men who are enjoined to make their
garments short, above the ankles. It also shows the shape and size of her
And Allaah knows best.