Please contribute generously in order to ensure the continuity of our website InshaAllah.
Whilst visiting some chat rooms, I read a very strange topic, and I want someone who has knowledge of the Prophet’s biography (sirah) to explain this matter to me, may Allah bless you.
To sum up, after researching the accusations the reports narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari which state that ’Aishah’s age, when the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did the marriage contract with her, was six years, and that he consummated the marriage with her when she was nine years old.
A journalist cast doubts on Sahih al-Bukhari. The researcher did not only examine the reports from the angle of figures and dates, but also from the angle of the isnads through which the most famous hadiths were narrated, as mentioned in al-Bukhari and Muslim.
In both cases, he seems to have wanted to demonstrate that he is smart and prove his point.
Praise be to Allah.
The definition of the age of ‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her) when the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did the marriage contract with her as being six years, and of the age when he consummated the marriage with her as being nine years, is not a matter of ijtihad (individual opinion) on the part of the scholars, such that we could argue whether it is right or wrong; rather this is a historical narration which is proven by evidence that confirms its soundness and the necessity of accepting it. That is for several reasons:
The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) married me when I was six years old. We came to Madinah and stayed among Banu’l-Harith ibn Khazraj. I fell sick and lost my hair, (then I recovered) and my hair grew down to my earlobes. My mother Umm Ruman came to me when I was on a swing and some of my friends were with me. She called me loudly and I went to her, and I did not know what she wanted of me. She took me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house, as I was gasping for breath, until I had calmed down. Then she took some water and wiped my face and head with it, then she took me into the house. There were some women of the Ansar in the house, who said: With good wishes and blessings and good luck. She handed me over to them and they adorned me, and suddenly I saw the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) at mid-morning, and they handed me over to him. At that time I was nine years old. (Narrated by al-Bukhari, 3894; Muslim, 1422)
Shaykh Abu Ishaq al-Huwayni compiled the names of those who followed ‘Urwah ibn az-Zubayr, namely: al-Aswad ibn Yazid, al-Qasim ibn ‘Abd ar-Rahman, al-Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, ‘Amrah bint ‘Abd ar-Rahman, and Yahya ibn ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Hatib.
He also compiled the names of those who followed Hisham ibn ‘Urwah in narrating this hadith. They were: Ibn Shihab az-Zuhri and Abu Hamzah Maymun, the freed slave of ‘Urwah.
Then he named those who narrated it from Hisham ibn ‘Urwah among the scholars of Madinah. The reader should understand that this hadith is one of those that were also narrated by Hisham in Madinah. They were: Abu’z-Zinnad ‘Abdullah ibn Dhakwan and his son ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi’z-Zinnad, and ‘Abdullah ibn Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn ‘Urwah.
Among the people of Makkah (it was narrated by) Sufyan ibn ‘Uyaynah.
(It was also narrated by) Jarir ibn ‘Abd al-Hamid ad-Dubbi among the people of ar-Rayy.
Among the people of Basra (it was narrated by): Hammad ibn Salamah, Hammad ibn Zayd, Wuhayb ibn Khalid, and others.
All of these lists are mentioned in order to ward off the specious argument of some ignorant people who say that Hisham ibn ‘Urwah was the only one who narrated it. Even if we accept that Hisham became confused at the end of his life, the correct view is that this accusation was made only by Abu’l-Hasan ibn al-Qattan in Bayan al-Wahm wa’l-Iham, and he was mistaken in doing so.
Adh-Dhahabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“Hisham ibn ‘Urwah was one of the prominent and authoritative scholars, but when he grew old his memory failed, although he did not get confused, and there is nothing valid in the view of Abu’l-Hasan ibn al-Qattan, which suggests that he and Suhayl ibn Abi Salih became confused and changed. Yes, the man changed a little and his memory was not as sound as it had been in his youth. He forgot some of the things he had memorized and he made some mistakes, but so what?! He was not infallible. When he came to Iraq at the end of his life he passed on a great deal of knowledge, among which were a few hadiths that he did not remember well. Something similar happened to Malik, Shu‘bah, Waki‘ and other senior, trustworthy narrators. So forget about this nonsense and mixing trustworthy scholars with weak narrators and those who became confused. Hisham was Shaykh al-Islam, and may Allah help us against what Ibn al-Qattan suggested and what ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Kharash said: Malik did not approve of him because he got angry with him for going and narrating hadith in Iraq.” (Mizan al-I‘tidal, 4/301-302)
Imam Ahmad narrated in al-Musnad, 6/112 from Muhammad ibn Bishr, who said: Muhammad ibn ‘Amr told us: Abu Salamah and Yahya told us: When Khadijah died, Khawlah bint Hakim, the wife of ‘Uthman ibn Maz‘un, came and said: O Messenger of Allah, why don’t you get married? He said: To whom? She said: If you wish, a virgin, and if you wish, a previously married woman. He said: Who is the virgin? She said: The daughter of the dearest of Allah’s creation to you: ‘Aishah bint Abi Bakr… And he mentioned the story in detail, including the fact that she was six years old when the marriage contract was done, and was nine years old when the marriage was consummated.
Imam al-Bayhaqi (may Allah have mercy on him) said – commenting on the hadith, “I only ever remember my parents as following Islam”–:
‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her) was born in Islam, because her father became Muslim at the beginning of the Prophet’s mission. It is proven from al-Aswad, from ‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her) that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) married her when she was six years old, and consummated the marriage with her when she was nine years old, and he died when she was eighteen years old. But Asma bint Abi Bakr was born during the Jahiliyyah, and became Muslim when her father became Muslim. … According to what Abu ‘Abdullah ibn Mandah said, narrating from Ibn Abi’z-Zinnad, Asma bint Abi Bakr was ten years older than ‘Aishah, and the mother of Asma became Muslim later on. Asma (may Allah be pleased with her) said: My mother came to me and she was (still) a mushrik. According to a hadith that she quoted, her name was Qatilah, from Banu Malik ibn Hasal. She was not the mother of ‘Aishah. Asma became Muslim when her father did, not her mother. With regard to ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr, it seems that he was an adult when his parents became Muslim, but he did not follow them in becoming Muslim, until he became Muslim a long time after that. He was the oldest of the children of Abu Bakr.” (As-Sunan al-Kubra, 6/203)
Adh-Dhahabi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
‘Aishah is one of those who were born in Islam; she was eight years younger than Fatimah. She used to say: “I only ever remember my parents as following Islam”.” (Siyar A‘lam an-Nubala, 2/139)
Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
“She – i.e., ‘Aishah – was born four or five years after the Prophet’s mission began.” (Al-Isabah, 8/16)
Based on that, her age at the time of the Hijrah was eight or nine years. This is in accordance with the hadith quoted above from ‘Aishah herself.
‘Aishah was born four or five years after the Prophet’s mission began. Abu Na‘im said in Mu‘jam as-Sahabah that Asma was born ten years before the Prophet’s mission began. End quote.
So the difference in age between ‘Aishah and Asma was fourteen or fifteen years. This is the view of adh-Dhahabi quoted above: She – i.e., Asma – was ten or more years older than ‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her).
As for the response to the author of the hostile article quoting as evidence what is narrated in some sources about the age difference between Asma and ‘Aishah being ten years, we say:
That is not proven in terms of the isnad or chain of narrators. If its isnad is proven, then it may be understood in a manner that is in accordance with the definitive evidence mentioned above.
With regard to the isnad or chain of narrators, it was narrated from ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi’z-Zinnad that he said: Asma bint Abi Bakr was ten years older than ‘Aishah.
This report was narrated via two isnads from al-Asma‘i from ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi’z-Zinnad.
The first isnad was narrated by Ibn ‘Asakir in Tarikh Dimashq (69/10). He said: Abu’l-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Ahmad al-Maliki told us: Ahmad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahid as-Sulami told us: My grandfather Abu Bakr told us: Abu Muhammad ibn Zabr told us: Ahmad ibn Sa‘d ibn Ibrahim az-Zuhri told us: Muhammad ibn Abi Safwan told us: al-Asma‘i told us, that Ibn Abi’z-Zinnad said: … and he quoted the report.
The second isnad was narrated by Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr in al-Isti‘ab fi Ma‘rifat al-Ashab (2/616): Ahmad ibn Qasim told us: Muhammad ibn Mu‘awiyah told us; Ibrahim ibn Musa ibn Jamil told us: Isma’i ibn Ishaq al-Qadi told us: Nasr ibn ‘Ali told us: al-Asma‘i told us: Ibn Abi’z-Zinnad told us: Asma bint Abi Bakr, who was ten years or so older than ‘Aishah, said:…
If the fair-minded researcher thinks about this report it will become clear to him that accepting its apparent meaning and rejecting all the proven evidence to the contrary is an offense against knowledge and scholarship, for the following reasons:
With regard to at-Tirmidhi describing him as thiqah (trustworthy) in his Sunan, following hadith no. 1755, this contradicts the criticism of the previous commentator, and criticism (of a narrator) takes precedence over praise, especially with regard to the reports that were narrated only by ‘Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi’z-Zinnad , especially when he says something that is contrary to what is well-known in the books of the Sunnah and history.
The words in the report of Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, “or so”, indicate that he was not certain about (the difference in age) being ten years. This makes his report weak and it is not permissible for the fair-minded researcher to reject the evidence quoted above for the sake of this uncertainty.
There follow the names of the sources that mention that:
With regard to the idea of her having been born ten years before the Prophet’s mission began, this was only stated by Abu Na‘im al-Asbahani, in a statement in which he said:
"She – i.e., Asma – was the sister of ‘Aishah through her father. She was older than ‘Aishah; she was born twenty-seven years before the Hijrah, and ten years before the mission of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) began. When she was born, her father (Abu Bakr) as-Siddiq was twenty-one years old. Asma died in 73 AH in Makkah, a few days after her son ‘Abdullah ibn az-Zubayr was killed, at the age of one hundred years, having lost her sight.”
It is as if Abu Na‘im meant that the Makkan period (of the Prophet’s mission) lasted for seventeen years, which is the view of some of the scholars of sirah; it is a da‘if (weak) view, but it should be pointed out when trying to understand the opinion of Abu Na‘im.
For the wisdom behind the marriage of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to ‘Aishah despite the difference in their ages, please see the answer to question no. 44990 .
And Allah knows best.