Sunday 21 Jumada al-akhirah 1446 - 22 December 2024
English

Intercourse with a slave woman is not regarded as zina (adultery)

20802

Publication : 26-12-2002

Views : 161397

Question

Hadith 3.718 : I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interrupts. Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Bani Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come into existence.”

Does this mean that the Companions of the Prophet didn’t commit adultery when they practiced ‘azl with the captive girls?.

Answer

Praise be to Allah.

Firstly:

This hadeeth was narrated by al-Bukhari (2542) from Ibn Muhayreez who said: I saw Abu Sa’eed (may Allah be pleased with him) and I asked him. He said: We went out with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) on the campaign of Banu al-Mustaliq, and we captured some prisoners from among the Arabs. We desired women and the period of abstention was hard for us, and we wanted to engage in ‘azl (coitus interruptus). We asked the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and he said, “There is no point in doing that, for there is no soul which Allah has decreed should exist until the Day of Resurrection but it will come into existence.”
According to another report, They captured some female prisoners and wanted to be intimate with them without them becoming pregnant. They asked the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) about ‘azl and he said, “There is no point in doing that, for Allah has decreed who should be created until the Day of Resurrection.”

This hadeeth was also narrated by Muslim (1438), whose version says: We captured some women of the Arabs and we had been abstinent for a long time; and we wanted to be able to sell them, but we wanted to engage in intimacy with coitus interruptus. We said, “Shall we do that when the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is among us without asking him about it?” So we asked the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and he said, “There is no point in doing that, for Allah has not decreed that any soul should be created until the Day of Resurrection but it will come into existence.”

It may be understood from the hadeeth that those who wanted to engage in ‘azl did so for two reasons: they did not want the women to become pregnant, and they wanted to be able to sell them – if a slave woman got pregnant she could not be sold.

It may also be understood that ‘azl (coitus interruptus) does not change anything. If Allah decrees that a child should be born, water (semen) will come out before the man realizes it.

Secondly:

Allah has permitted intimacy with a slave woman if the man owns her. This is not regarded as adultery as suggested in the question. Allah says, describing the believers (interpretation of the meaning):

“those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)

Except from their wives or (the slaves) that their right hands possess,__ for then, they are free from blame” [al-Mu’minoon 23:5]

What is meant by “those whom their right hands possess” is slave women or concubines.  See also question no.12562.

Once this is understood, it should be noted that what is suggested in the question, that this was zina, never occurred to the Sahaabah (may Allah be pleased with them). What they were asking about was the ruling on practicing ‘azl with the slave women whom they had acquired in the course of jihad.

Moreover ‘azl may be done with a concubine or with a wife, if she agrees to that. See question no. 11885.

And Allah knows best.

Was this answer helpful?

Source: Islam Q&A